Read why a new vessel inspection regulation (passed behind closed
doors by INCOPESCA and now being hailed by INCOPESCA as a responsible
step to protect sharks) condones violations of existing regulations,
nullifies previous responsible but unenforced regulations, actually
makes it easier for foreign fleets to land shark fins in CR, and defies shark biology research.
New Costa Rican Shark Fin Regulation Leaves Door Wide Open for Continued Port Violations
Tico Times Article(Eng) Full
PRETOMA statement(Eng) INCOPESCA
Plan(Sp)
(San Jose, Costa Rica) October 10, 2003 - on October 2, 2003,
INCOPESCA (Costa Rican National Fishery Department) officials published
(in La Gaceta AJDIP/415) a new decree they claim will allow for more
effective inspections of foreign fishing vessels that have for years
been seen violating Costa Rican port rules by landing shark fins at
Costa Rican ports. The decree calls for members of the National
Union
of Biologists to participate in vessel inspections, even inspect
vessels in lieu of an INCOPESCA inspector.
PRETOMA released a detailed public statement today listing its concerns about the new plan. Link to full statement
Far
from improving controls over shark fin landings, PRETOMA considers that
the plan actually fails to abide by existing Customs and Ministry of
Public Transportation regulations which PRETOMA contends forbid foreign
vessels from landing at private docks and during non office hours.
PRETOMA also considers that the new plan creates a far more complicated
and expensive inspection processes, and hinders the collection of
accurate scientific information.
"In 2001 INCOPESCA itself
passed an easily applicable regulation to ensure vessels do not land
shark fins, by demanding that shark carcasses be landed with the fins
attached," said Randall Arauz, President of PRETOMA. "Now, INCOPESCA
is going to allow the landing of detached shark fins as long as the fin
weight corresponds to a certain carcass-to-fins ratio. How is a more
complicated system that requires analyzing shark fin-to-bodyweight
ratios a better solution?" asked a concerned Arauz. "Of greater
concern is the ratio allowed," added Arauz. "Biologists around the
world agree that shark fins equal 2-5% of shark bodyweight. In the
United States and the European Union, no greater than a 5% ratio of
fins-to-carcasses is allowed, but in Costa Rica this ratio will now be
as high as 16%. This will allow vessels the opportunity to discard all
large shark carcasses at sea to save space in the vessel's hold, and
keep only smaller sharks to meet the required ratio."
"PRETOMA
contends that two key regulations that currently exist, but are not
enforced, prohibit foreign fishing vessels from both unloading cargo at
private docks and from unloading outside the hours of 6am-6pm, Monday
through Friday," said Jorge Ballestero, PRETOMA Fishery Researcher.
"Unfortunately, the new decree does not address prohibited landings at
private docks and calls for biologists to inspect vessels outside
authorized hours," notes Ballestero.
"The more you read
INCOPESCA's plan the more you have to question it," said Irene Boza,
PRETOMA Shark Researcher. The plan leaves open the possibility that
some vessels will not be inspected. If no inspector is available,
INCOPESCA expects vessel owners merely to make sworn declarations of
the cargo they unload. With all the denouncements that have been filed
about foreign vessels, putting so much trust in the owners of foreign
vessels does not seem prudent." PRETOMA, along with multiple other
NGOs, environmental lawyers and government officials, including the
Coast Guard, had previously been discussing the Union of Biologist plan
with INCOPESCA and expressing concerns about an original version of the
plan. INCOPESCA officials appeared receptive and a meeting was
scheduled for October 9 for further discussions. Surprisingly, on
October 2 INCOPESCA's original plan was published in the government
newspaper La Gaceta signifying full passage of the regulation.
"We
have serious objections to this new plan," states Arauz. "We would
like to see a return to the regulation allowing vessels to only unload
fins attached to bodies. We also call for existing rules of all port
regulatory agencies to be strictly enforced," insisted Arauz. "If
INCOPESCA moves ahead with this plan we would like to see The Biologist
Union used to compile and process biological information, but we can
not condone this new plan unless it complies with other port
regulations, and is founded in accepted scientific norms." |