|
Last Monday July 12, 2004, the Costa Rican newspaper La Nación,
published the following article by Randall Arauz in the Forum Section,
on how negligence undermines marine conservation in Costa Rica.
Last
Monday July 12, 2004, the Costa Rican newspaper La Nación, published
the following article by Randall Arauz in the Forum Section, on how
negligence undermines marine conservation in Costa Rica.
www.tortugamarina.org/downloads/pdf/opinion12704.pdf
I
also recommend you check out this cartón that was published by the
University of Costa Rica's weekly newspaper. It include sharks, sea
turtles and dolphins.
www.tortugamarina.org/downloads/cartoonuniv.jpg
Shark Fin Trade
Negligence undermines marine conservation.
Randall Arauz Sea Turtle Restoration Program of Costa Rica PRETOMA
During
the last months, the interest of the current government, through the
Ministry of the Environment (MINAE), to promote national and regional
marine conservation has become evident. The protection of Cocos Island
National Park, a World Heritage Site, from illegal fisheries and piracy
has been effectively strengthened, and only a month ago, a decree was
signed that declared the interest of the authorities to protect up to
25% of the nation's Exclusive Economic Zone under some sort of
conservation and management regime. Our nation has also been active
internationally, and recently signed a Convention with Colombia,
Ecuador and Panama, to protect our shared marine resources and promote
their responsible and sustainable exploitation. Furthermore, at the
United Nations, Costa Rica is leading a process to prohibit certain
destructive industrial fishing practices in international waters.
Obviously, it will be a long process, as it will be necessary to
promulgate new domestic laws and regulations, as well as to reach
agreements among diverse nations on the sustainable and responsible
use of marine resources at the high seas.
Unfortunately, faced with the overfishing and illegal landing of shark
fins by international flag vessels at the ports of our nation, the
negligent actions of INCOPESCA, the official entity that regulates
fisheries, as well as Customs, which must regulate international
commerce, threatens to undermine these efforts, and tarnishes our
international image and credibility.
Up to November of 2003, it
was forbidden to land shark fins in our country, a visionary regulation
that deserved international recognition. Nonetheless, under pressure
from the press that was widely reporting on violations of this rule,
INCOPESCA decided that, instead of complying with the regulation, it
was better to substitute it with a new regulation that implies a
complicated system of crossed controls, in such a way that now landing
shark fins is allowed. This change was made possible thanks to a
poorly executed study which, according to over 60 biologists of the
nation's most prestigious academic institutions, does not follow the
formal protocol of serious research and ignores the best scientific
evidence available. The study can only be considered subjective, and
any management based on it, capricious.
On the other hand, the
National Customs Law quite clearly mandates that the landing of fishery
products that come from international waters must occur in public
docks, or, in private docks that have been duly authorized. However,
every month, dozens of international flag vessels land at the private
docks of Puntarenas, outside of any existing legal framework. Instead
of simply complying with their own law, Customs does as INCOPESCA, and
promulgates complicated systems of crossed controls. Even if these
controls had any efficiency whatsoever, Customs has decided to ignore
the true nature of the issue: the landing of fishery products at docks
that have not been authorized, is illegal.
Its about time for
President Pacheco to make a decision. It isn't possible to cast an
international conservationist image, and at the same time promote the
illegal landing of shark fins by international fleets. The decision is
quite an easy one: either abide by our current existing legislation
and direct fishing policy based on the best scientific evidence
available, or accept, with indifference, our nation's participation and
blame in the current overfishing and eventual extinction of the
endangered marine species of the Eastern Pacific.
|